Precursor of 911
Who is responsible for 911?
War Games Simulations on 911 that interfered with response times
World Trade Center Building 7 (the 3rd skyscrapper that fell in NYC on 911)
What a lot of people, even two decades later, are not familiar with is the fact that three skyscrapers collapsed in New York City on 911. Everyone is familiar with the Twin Towers (Buildings 1&2) falling, but many people are not familiar with the collapse of Building 7, which fell down after 5pm that evening. Building 7 was not struck by a plane, but according to the government it collapsed due to “office furnishing fires” that was started by debris from the collapse of the North Tower. As David Icke said, when it comes to the official story of 911, Building 7 is the Achilles heel. Icke says,
“The other World Trade Center building to collapse that day was the 47-storey Building 7, also known as the Salomon Brothers Building. This fell in exactly the nature of a controlled demolition at 5:20pm without being hit by an aircraft and became the first steel-framed skyscraper in history to be brought down purely by fire (according to government).” 1[David Icke. Pg. 335-336] David Icke, The Trigger: The Lie That Changed the World, David Icke Books; Illustrated edition (September 1, 2019), ISBN-10 : 1916025803, ISBN-13 : 978-1916025806
Paul Joseph Watson, in his book Order Out of Chaos, also says,
“Furthermore, even if we accept the notion that jet fuel caused the collapse of the north and south towers, how do we explain the perfect implosion of WTC Building 7, which wasn’t even hit by anything except a small amount of flying debris? … Photographs of the building taken at 3pm show two small pockets of fire on the 7th and 12th floors. There was little smoke and rescue vehicles and onlookers stand just across the road-there was no indication whatsoever and no reason for the subsequent collapse. Some suggest diesel fuel and emergency generators inside the building caught fire but FEMA admitted in their own report that recovered diesel tanks remained intact after the collapse.” 30[Paul Joseph Watson] Paul Joseph Watson, Order out of Chaos (Order out of Chaos – Elite Sponsored Terrorism & the NEW World Order) January 1, 2003, ISBN-10: 0974338109, ISBN-13: 978-0974338101, AEJ Productions
To this day there are some video clips online that show the collapse of Building 7 (though Big Tech has been removing them). When one watches the video, many people agree that it is an obvious display of a controlled demolition. This building falls at free-fall speed right into its own footprint. No other steel-framed building has ever collapsed due to fire alone, and for this building to not only collapse but to fall at free fall speed like it did, being the perfect example of a controlled demolition, it totally makes the government narrative sound corrupt and dubious. Even the owner of Building 7, Larry Silverstein, who also was leasing the Twin Towers, and who took out massive insurance policies just weeks before the attacks and made billions from the insurance, came out and told PBS television in an interview that, on that day,
“I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it’. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.”31 Larry Silverstein in an interview on PBS in a television documentary on September 2002
The expression “pull it,” as David Icke explains,
“This term is used by the demolition industry and emergency services as short-hand for ‘pull it down’ – demolish it.” 1[David Icke, Pg. 337]
And Eric Dubay elaborates,
“Since letting this slip in the interview Silverstein has tried to explain away his statement saying he meant ‘pull the firefighters out,’ not ‘pull the building down.’ But the fact of the matter is he said ‘pull it’ a common demolitions term, not ‘pull (them) out’ referring to firefighters. Later on in the same documentary, preceding the controlled demolition of WTC building 6, a cleanup worker even says, ‘we’re getting ready to pull building six.’ It is typical jargon when imploding a building.” 3[Eric Dubay] Eric Dubay, The Atlantean Conspiracy (Final Edition) lulu.com (November 23, 2009), ISBN-10 : 1304634396, ISBN-13 : 978-1304634399
The Twin Towers
The official story of the collapse of the Twin Towers says that the buildings collapsed due to structural damaged caused by the impact of the planes and the weakening of the steel frames due to the heat generated by the jet fuel, which caused each floor to collapse and pancake on top of one another. But there are problems with this “theory,” and a theory it is, because there was never a real investigation of the “crime scene” because the government did not allow the area to be investigated properly, and they rushed to remove all the debris, having the metal quickly shipped to Asia for smelting.
But thanks to investigators searching for the truth of what happened on 911, evidence has shown that thermite was used to help bring down the WTC buildings, as Christopher Bollyn explains,
“One of the most significant events in the search for the truth of 9-11 was the recent publication of a scientific paper, written by nine scientists, about the discovery of ‘active thermitic material’ found in the dust from the collapsed towers of the World Trade Center. Such an important discovery would be front page news if we lived in a truly democratic society with a free press. Alas. The paper, written by Dr. Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University and eight others, follows up on earlier research by Jones of the evidence of thermite in the collapse of the three towers of the World Trade Center. This study is of great importance because it reveals the physical evidence that active thermite, in an extremely explosive ‘super-thermite’ form, was found in large amounts in the dust from the collapsed towers. This positive physical proof of super-thermite is a huge breakthrough; a first in the scientific search for the truth of what happened when the twin towers exploded on the morning of 9-11.” 32[Christopher Bollyn] Christopher Bollyn, article Super-Thermite Demolished Twin Towers on 9-11, April 14, 2009 https://www.bollyn.com/super-thermite-demolished-twin-towers-on-9-11/
In the same article, Bollyn provides a photograph showing the explosion at impact from the planes, and described how the coloring showed signs that thermite was involved, saying,
“Evidence of thermite was evident from the first moment. The light-orange explosive cloud to the left is coming from the point of impact. The whitish clouds are indicative of pre-planted thermite explosives in the area targeted for impact.”32
And Bollyn further elaborates concerning thermite,
“The towers were not brought down by the fires caused by the burning fuel of two airliners; they were demolished with pre-planted explosives, including large amounts of an extremely potent form of super-thermite, which had been applied to surfaces of the building in the months prior to 9-11. Osama Bin Laden and his gang of twenty certainly did not spray super-thermite throughout the towers of World Trade Center in the weeks and months before 9-11 – so who did?”32
And Bollyn also provided another photo of liquid molten metal pouring out prior to the collapse and further expounds,
“The tons of molten metal seen cascading from the South Tower seconds before it collapsed indicated the use of thermite as did the tiny spheres of iron found in the dust and the molten iron found in the basements of all three collapsed towers. The discovery of active super-thermite in the dust of the collapsed towers, however, is compelling proof that an extremely explosive form of nano-sized thermite was used to demolish and pulverize the towers – and the hundreds of people trapped within them.”32
For fire to produce molten steel, it has to be over 2800 degrees Fahrenheit, and jet fuel burns at 1000 degrees cooler than that.
Explosions and Collapse
The amount of testimonies from eyewitnesses about hearing explosions prior to the collapses and during the collapses further defies the official narrative that the buildings came down due to planes and jet fuel. Paramedic Daniel Rivera, as quoted by David Icke, described what he saw and heard, “It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it was – do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear ‘Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop?’ … I thought it was that.”1 That is just one of many examples of similar testimonies from eyewitnesses describing hearing consecutive explosions like what you hear in controlled demolitions. WilliamRodriguez, a janitor in Sub-level 1 of the World Trade Center testified to bombs exploding in the basement several seconds before the planes even hit the buildings! His testimony was completely ignored by the 9/11 Commission report.3 Jim Marrs, The Illuminati: The Secret Society That Hijacked the World, Visible Ink Press, 2017, ISBN:9781578596485, 1578596483
Christopher Bollyn describes the irregularity of the “collapse”,
“The floors and structures around the core were evidently exploded first – and then the core columns were cut with steel-cutting thermite charges, explosions that were shrouded by the dust and noise of the exploding floors. This is quite unlike the logical progression of a normal collapse even in the case of demolition. This is to say that the 47 weight-bearing core columns were not cut first leading to the collapses. The destruction of the Twin Towers were not really collapses although the demolition of WTC 7 resulted in a collapse that resembled a normal controlled demolition.
The 110 floors of each tower were simply exploded before, blowing downwards and away from the cores in a way that was designed to look like a collapse. There was one problem: the ‘collapses’ fell faster than an object in free fall. This was the first solid piece of evidence that the towers had been demolished with explosives. The ‘collapses’ occurred faster than the laws of physics allow — because they were not natural collapses. If they had been natural collapses there would have been layers of concrete pancaked on top of each other in the rubble pile, which is what often happens to multi-level buildings in strong earthquakes. We would expect to find 110 slabs of concrete and their steel pans stacked on top of each other, yet there is no evidence that any of these floor pans were found in the rubble, much less 110 of them stacked up. Where did these 220 steel floor pans go? How could they have simply disappeared? The fact that they were not found stacked up in the rubble clearly disproves the official version (NIST) of the ‘collapses’ of the Twin Towers.” 33[Christopher Bollyn]Christopher Bollyn, article The Exploding Floors of 9-11, September 3, 2009, https://www.bollyn.com/the-exploding-floors-of-9-11-2/
Twin Towers Computer Rooms
What struck me odd about the planes striking the Twin Towers is that the noses of both planes flew directly into secure computer rooms in both buildings. Christopher Bollyn wisely asks,
“Is that merely a coincidence or were the computer rooms equipped to play a role in the crime? Were there homing devices, for example, in the computer rooms that guided the planes to their targets? Were there pre-placed explosives or Thermite on these floors that created the spectacular explosions while destroying the evidence and assisting with the collapses?” 34[Christopher Bollyn] Christopher Bollyn, article 9-11 Planes Flew Directly into Secure Computer Rooms in Both Towers, January 11, 2007 https://www.bollyn.com/9-11-planes-flew-directly-into-secure-computer-rooms-in-both-towers/
The first plane hit the 96th floor of the North Tower directly into the computer rooms. Sixteen minutes later the second plane hit the South Tower. What Bollyn observed was that the South Tower was struck by the plane on the 81st floor computer room, and that is where many tons of molten metal was seen falling prior to the collapse. Bollyn explains,
“If this was molten iron, as Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University says, and if this molten iron was caused by an aluminothermic reaction of Thermite or Thermate (steel-cutting explosives created from powdered aluminum, iron oxide, and sulfur), then somebody must have pre-loaded the 81st floor of WTC 2 with several tons of a form of Thermite.”34
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) in their report suggested that this was melted aluminum, but the color of aluminum would have appeared silverish-grey, but the color of the molten metal was yellow and white hot, indicating that this was molten steel.
Bollyn also noted that he was told by a former bank employee that visited the 81st floor on a daily basis, described how there were lots of batteries on that floor, saying,
“‘The whole floor was batteries,’ he said, ‘huge battery-looking things.’ They were ‘all black’ and ‘solid, very heavy’ things that had been brought in during the night. They had been put in place during the summer prior to 9-11, he said. But were they really batteries? ‘It’s weird,’ he said. ‘They were never turned on.’ So, what really was on the 81st floor of WTC 2? What was in these heavy ‘battery-looking things?’ Were they batteries, or were they Thermite?”34
It took me years before I started questioning the official story of 911. I accepted what the government said about the event and I even supported the wars back then. Even though I trusted what we were told, I do remember finding it odd how the Pentagon of all places could have been so easily attacked. I assumed that any aircraft would have been shot out of the air beforehand. I remember discussing it with my father that day and we both sort of jokingly said that we figured a plane would have been shot down by the Pentagon with lasers, humorously meaning that we figured that the Pentagon would have been protected by the most sophisticated and state of the art weapon technology. I believed the official narrative, but I remember just assuming that I must have overestimated the security of the Pentagon. I was very naïve about government corruption and how the world really runs. What led me to research 911 and finally start questioning the official story was the day I decided to look for video footage of the Pentagon getting struck by the plane. It had been over a decade after the event and I never remembered ever seeing any video of the plane striking the Pentagon, so I thought by that point in time, after many years later, there would have been some footage that caught the event. Much to my surprise there was only one very poor-quality unconvincing video that basically shows a streak across the screen and a fireball. That is it! This was the moment when I knew something was just not right. This led me down the rabbit hole, and I became consumed in the search for the truth about 911.
The Day Before 911
Many people are not aware that the very day before the attacks of 911, there was an “investigation” announced by Donald Rumsfeld concerning 2.3 trillion dollars that disappeared from the Pentagon budget. Typically, this would be the news of the century, but this was announced at the perfect time because it got swept under the rug immediately the following day after the events of 911. What is most disturbing is that on the very next day the Pentagon was struck in the precise area that the accountants, auditors, and budget analysts were investigating where the money went.
Lack of Video Footage
As I mentioned above, what led me down the “rabbit hole” was the lack of video footage of the Pentagon getting struck by Flight 77. The Pentagon being the headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, one would figure that the security of the place would be highly guarded and surveilled to the gills. And it was! “The Pentagon is not your ordinary run-of the-mill office building. The Pentagon is the military headquarters for the mightiest military power on earth. It is the home of the US Navy, Army, Air Force, Marines, and Special Operations.”35 At the time of the attack there were more than 80 surveillance cameras positioned at the Pentagon and nearby businesses. The fact that the public was not shown multiple angles of Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon is suspicious to say the least, especially nearly 2 decades later there only being a spurious video that proves nothing.
Flight 77 and Lack of Wreckage
The official story about the flight path and maneuvers of Flight 77, the incompetence of the piloting hijacker Hani Hanjour, the lack of wreckage at the scene, etc., raises a ton of questions about what really happened and was it really Flight 77 that struck the Pentagon. Eric Dubay listed the details, saying,
“In the minutes preceding, the plane allegedly performed a highly technical 330-degree banking turn descending 7000 ft. in 3 minutes at over 500mph. Many pilots have gone on the record stating that this is absolutely impossible, like commercial and Air Force pilot Russ Wittenburg who told Wing TV, ‘[Flight 77] could not possibly have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into a high-speed stall. The airplane won’t go that fast when you start pulling those high G maneuvers. That plane would have fallen out of the sky.’ … As news teams arrived on the scene, early footage of the Pentagon shows no skid-marks on the lawn, no bodies, no blood, no significant pieces of wreckage – just a small, smoldering 20-foot hole in the wall. After reports of secondary explosions and the roof collapsing, the hole widened marginally, but even then remained far too small to account for a 155 ft. long, 44 ft. high, 124 ft. wide, 100 ton Boeing 757. Small plane scraps were found inside and on the lawn, but most were small enough to be carried off by hand. There were no titanium engines, no indestructible landing gear, no major wing pieces, fuselage, or tail sections anywhere to be found. There were no bodies or blood anywhere either, yet supposedly forensics specialists were able to positively identify 184 of the 187 passengers through DNA work. 80 CCTV cameras were watching the point of impact at the Pentagon, including security cameras at the nearby hotel and gas station, but employees said FBI agents came within minutes to confiscate their tapes. All 80 tapes have been withheld from public view for “national security reasons,” save 5 frames they released that show the explosion but no plane.” 4[Eric Dubay]
If that wasn’t Flight 77 then what was it? And what happened to the real Flight 77 and the passengers? This leads to many speculations, which a thorough 911 analysis is not the intentions and purpose of this book. The purpose of this discussion is to point out that 911 was a false flag event orchestrated by the same Global Cabal that has been behind other false flag events throughout recent history that has led to wars, profit, and power by way of “Problem, Reaction, Solution.” While aiming to determine what really struck the Pentagon, some have speculated and suggested things like a missile or a drone decked out to resemble Flight 77. It has also been suggested that all the planes involved in 911 could have been hacked and overridden from the ground and guided to their intended targets. The technology to takeover aircrafts has been around long before the year 2001. I highly recommend those interested in learning about the events of 911 in great detail to get the book by David Icke called The Trigger1 which is nearly 900 pages of a total body of research and analysis on 911. That book dissects and expounds on every angle of that dreadful day. Christopher Bollyn’s44 contribution to exposing the truth about 911 is also extremely valuable. And the work of Jim Marrs has been priceless, including his book The Terror Conspiracy: Deception, 9/11 and the Loss of Liberty.
Testimony of Norman Mineta
Norman Mineta was the US Secretary of Transportation at the time of 911, and his testimony (under oath) given to the 911 Commission (which they omitted from the Report) shows that Vice President Dick Cheney was fully aware that Flight 77 (or whatever the craft was) was being tracked prior to the strike on the Pentagon. Mineta provided a full account of his experience that morning, testifying that he arrived at the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) at 9:20am and that Dick Cheney was already present with his staff. This testimony is contradictory to the version given by Dick Cheney and the 911 Commission Report but is supported by the testimony of General Wesley Clarke36 that said that he saw Cheney and Condoleezza Rice gathering papers and preparing to leave for the PEOC around 9:10am. Here is what Mineta said,
“During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President…the plane is 50 miles out…the plane is 30 miles out….and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president ‘do the orders still stand?’ And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said ‘Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!??’”
The ”orders” that are referred to is, according to Mineta as he assumed, were orders to shoot the plane down. That doesn’t make sense because the plane that was being tracked was not shot down, so the order was probably not to shoot it down and allow it to reach its target. No wonder the “young man” that Mineta was referring to said that he (the young man) sounded anxious and acted like he wanted more confirmation from Cheney. This testimony by Mineta is so damning to the official report and Cheney’s story that “in the CNN piece Cheney aid Josh Bolton describes the same exchange between Cheney and the young man that Mineta did, but Bolton ties the exchange to “a report that a plane over Pennsylvania was heading for Washington”. This is the official White House legend, the one adopted in the White House produced 9/11 Commission Report, the one exposed by Mineta.”37 The Mineta Testimony: 9/11 Commission Exposed, By Staff -July 22, 2005, https://911truth.org/the-mineta-testimony-911-commission-exposed/
Attack on Pentagon was the Trigger for War
Unlike the other strikes that day, the strike on the Pentagon was justification for immediate grounds for war, as Carol Valentine describes,
“According to the Official Story, the 9-11 attack on the Pentagon was an act of war. Rumsfeld and the top brass had lawful jurisdiction over the piece of real estate on which the ‘act of war’ had just occurred; the Pentagon building was a war zone.”35
This is very important because this clues us in on why the strike on the Pentagon was essential for the “plan.” This was the quick justification they needed to declare the War on Terror.
Shanksville “Crash” (Flight 93)
As with every other part of the official story of 911, the official story of what happened in Shanksville Pennsylvania is full of problems. The official story says that Flight 93 crashed in a field after passengers revolted against the hijackers. This crash, like the crash at the Pentagon, left little to no debris visible to first responders. The number of statements by witnesses and those responding to the crash largely remarked on the lack of debris that would have indicated that there was a plane crash. Here a couple statements by those who arrived early on the scene, as quoted from David Icke’s book the Trigger,
“If you were to go down there, you wouldn’t know that was a plane crash. You would look around and say, ‘I wonder what happened here?’ The first impression looking around you wouldn’t say, ‘Oh, looks like a plane crash.’ The debris is very, very small.” (State Police Officer Lyle Szupinka)
“I got to the actual crash site and could not believe what I saw. … Usually you see much debris, wreckage, and much noise and commotion. This crash was different. There was no wreckage, no bodies, and no noise. … It appeared as though there were no passengers or crew on this plane.” (Wallace Miller, coroner of Somerset Co. Penn.)1
All the removal of the “wreckage” in the area where the official story claimed that it happened was done in the sternest secrecy, and the recovered parts were taken to Iron Mountain, which was a covert storage facility that is 200 feet below the ground at Beyers, Pennsylvania. The crater at the supposed crash site was estimated to be around 20 feet long and 15 feet wide, which seems suspicious, and raises questions, considering that the plane was 155 feet long and 125 wide and weighing 220,000 pounds. We are told by the government that the plane went nose first into the field and was swallowed up by the ground, which is why debris, bodies, and luggage were not seen by first responders and video footage. But there were lots of testimonies by witnesses who found debris scattered for miles, as reported by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, saying,
“Residents and workers at businesses outside Shanksville, Somerset County, reported discovering clothing, books, papers and what appeared to be human remains. Some residents said they collected bags-full of items to be turned over to investigators. Others reported what appeared to be crash debris floating in Indian Lake, nearly six miles from the immediate crash scene.
Workers at Indian Lake Marina said that they saw a cloud of confetti-like debris descend on the lake and nearby farms minutes after hearing the explosion that signaled the crash at 10:06 a.m. Tuesday.”38
A considerable number of eyewitnesses told of seeing a white jet flying around the area at the time of the crash. They described it as a military-type jet flying over and circling around the crash site at the time of the crash, and then took off upwards and left the scene. One eyewitness, Susan Mcelwain gave a description of a small white jet with rear engines and no discernible markings swooped low over her minivan near an intersection and disappeared over a hilltop, nearly clipping the tops of trees lining the ridge. From all the descriptions, it has been suggested by some researchers to have probably been a US Air Force Warthog.
Christopher Bollyn discovered more shocking details when he investigated what happened in Shanksville. He visited the site multiple times and interviewed people who owned the property next to the location where the supposed crash happened. Here is what he had to say,
“The debris of Flight 93 fell in the woods and covered a large area. This is the real debris field and was kept hidden from the view of the public and the press while the bodies and evidence were picked up. The small crater in the reclaimed mine was most likely caused by a missile fired from the Thunderbolt aircraft that was seen circling the area before and after Flight 93 was shot down over the woods. … The public was told that the plane had crashed at the site of the crater while the real debris field was located in the woods beginning at a distance of about 100 meters in the woods, around the cottage of Barry Hoover. … To clarify the location of Barry Hoover’s cottage in relation to the crater “crash site” I spoke with Reverend Larry Hoover, a Lutheran minister and father of Barry. Larry Hoover owns the two houses on his property that begins with the tree line at the edge of the reclaimed mine.
The cottage his son Barry lived in is about ‘one football field’ (100 meters) into the woods from the crater, Larry Hoover said. Larry’s house is about ‘three football fields’ from the crater, he said. He said that luggage had been found around his house while body parts had been found more around Barry’s cottage. The Hoover property is about 7 to 9 acres, he said. The debris was found on property belonging to three people, including the owner of the reclaimed mine. … I wanted to know why the existence of the real debris field deep in the woods had been kept hidden so I asked Reverend Hoover, ‘Why have you been quiet about what happened on your property on 9-11?’
‘We tried to cooperate,’ he said. I knew what he meant without pressing the point. The FBI agents had given similar orders all over Shanksville and Somerset County. The Hoovers had been asked not to talk about what had happened on 9-11. The public was told that the plane had crashed into the reclaimed mine while the real debris field was cleaned up in complete secrecy in the woods around the Hoover cabins.
Why has the real debris field been kept secret? There can only be one explanation: the truth about what happened to Flight 93 could not be revealed to the public. The evidence indicates that Flight 93 was shot out of the sky with a blast that sounded like ‘an atomic bomb,’ as one witness told me. … If Flight 93 was shot down with such precision, and the truth concealed with an elaborate deception, there are several crucial questions I would ask: Exactly how many people were on Flight 93? Did Flight 93 really land in Cleveland on 9-11 and were passengers from other flights put onto the flight before it was shot down? Is this what really happened to the passengers of Flights 11 and 175? Why was Wally Miller, the Somerset County Coroner, forced to turn over the ‘crash’ site to the FBI? Why did he abdicate his responsibility for the site and the recovery of the bodies, his obligation under state law? Why was he not even allowed to be involved in the identification of the remains of the passengers of Flight 93, whose death certificates he duly signed?
The evidence certainly indicates that something extremely ugly happened over Shanksville on 9-11 and the evidence of the atrocity was strewn about the woods surrounding the Hoover property.” 39[Christopher Bollyn]
Barbra Olsen’s and CeeCee Lyles Phone Calls From Planes
The Planes Used In 911
The Pathetic Official Narrative of 911
Predictive Programming of 911